FAA Knowledge Tests Rant

I doubt I will find any dissenting opinions but I wonder just what is the point of the knowledge test. I understand that is supposed to test one’s knowledge of some aspect of what it takes to get a rating and I would be fine with that if it wasn’t for the way the questions are posed. More often than not the question is written with the aim of tricking you, rather than testing. Having to choose between NM and SM (I can never remember which one is used for what) might be a good question academically but when I’m in the air I doubt there are many who can tell if they have a 3 mile SM or NM view from the cockpit.

When I took my Commercial written 3 years ago I got a 92. I haven’t picked up the books yet but my practice tests with both Sporty’s and Gleim (my Gleim must be out of date as it has no ILS questions) are getting a steady low 80 score, so still plenty of work to do. Mostly I am missing weather questions, and HSI/RMI questions with a random mistakes elsewhere. Once I am consistently scoring in the 90s I’ll schedule an exam.



Leave a Reply

Formatting: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Other Entries

Your Pilot In Command

I got my private pilot certificate in Feb 2002, and my instrument rating exaclty one year later in 2003. I fly out of Montgomery Field, San Diego, renting Cessna 172s, 182s, and Piper Archers from PlusOneFlyers. I also have high performance and complex endorsements.

Currently, I have approximately 295 hours of PIC time, including 450 landings, and a monster 6.4 hours of actual instrument time. January 2009